Why are there so many comparisons among those roles?
Why are these roles so often compared?
Because their responsibilities overlap in ways that confuse teams, stakeholders, and even hiring managers. Misunderstandings about objectives and functions often lead to friction or inefficiency.
Definitions First
- Project: A carefully planned undertaking—individual or collaborative—designed to achieve a specific goal. It consists of interrelated tasks executed over a fixed period, within cost and resource constraints (source).
- Product (in project management): a deliverable or set of deliverables that contribute to a business solution (source).
The Four Roles in Context
- Project Manager (PM): Plans tasks, tracks execution, and ensures everyone—team, stakeholders, customer—is informed.
- Product Manager (PM): Oversees alignment with business strategy, coordinates across teams (e.g., marketing, third-party vendors), and acts as a strategic stakeholder.
- Product Owner (PO): Bridges business needs and engineering. Owns the product backlog and ensures the team builds what the customer actually wants.
- Scrum Master (SM): Facilitates Agile processes, removes blockers, and protects the team’s focus.
Strategic Placement of Roles
Product Managers and Product Owners are tightly aligned with customer needs and business strategy. They often sit closer to the customer side of the table.
But every project needs someone with a panoramic view—someone who can manage stakeholders, delegate effectively, communicate status, and identify risks. This doesn’t require a command-and-control style. It requires clarity, empathy, and systems thinking.
Jeff Sutherland’s Insight
Jeff Sutherland, co-creator of Scrum, once said:
“When I created the Product Owner role, I gave it more responsibility for product strategy and revenue generation than a Product Manager… more responsibility for directly working with engineering 50% of the time… The goal was to eliminate the common Product Manager failing of throwing requirements over the wall…”
This quote reveals a communication gap between those who “do” and those who “request.” It’s a classic Waterfall pitfall: delivering something the customer didn’t want.
The Agile Manifesto (2001), co-authored by Sutherland, emphasized individuals and interactions over processes and tools. That shift was a direct response to these communication failures.
The C3 Project Areas
In many projects—Agile or not—the outcome falls short. Sometimes the goal isn’t achieved. Worse, money and effort are spent without meaningful results.
I believe every project should be guided by three interrelated areas:
- Clarity – Define goals, roles, and expectations.
- Communication – Ensure continuous dialogue between all parties.
- Coordination – Align tasks, timelines, and dependencies.
If a Project Manager understands and actively manages these areas, the perception and outcome of the project can shift dramatically.
Before jumping to conclusions like “Agile is always better,” pause and reflect on the root issue: communication. The methodology matters, but the mindset matters more.
Where It Fits in the Role Matrix?
- Project Manager: Owns the critical path. Ensures visibility and accountability across all roles.
- Product Manager: Aligns critical deliverables with business milestones.
- Product Owner: Prioritizes backlog items that intersect with critical path tasks.
- Scrum Master: Shields the team from distractions so critical path work stays on track.
Communication Plan
A robust communication plan is essential for project success. It ensures that all stakeholders are informed, aligned, and engaged throughout the project lifecycle. Every effective communication plan should address two key dimensions:
- Recurrence: How often communication occurs (e.g., weekly meetings, monthly reports).
- Type: The format and channel used (e.g., meetings, emails, reports).
Communication is not just a side activity—it’s a strategic component of the project plan. It must be agreed upon by all parties, and more importantly, it must be backed by genuine commitment.
Core Communication Activities
Below is a list of recommended communication events and artifacts. You can tailor these to your methodology—Agile, Waterfall, hybrid—or project scale.
This list below reflects practical communication elements that support transparency and engagement. There are certainly more formats and tools available, and many guides offer deeper dives into each. But the principle remains: people stay engaged when they’re well-informed.
1) Kick-off Meeting
The first official meeting of the project. All key participants should attend. Use this session to align on:
- Project goals and execution strategy
- Roles and responsibilities
- Expected involvement from end-users
- Key milestones (e.g., UAT phase)
- Communication cadence and channels
- Stakeholder meeting frequency
2) Project Status Meeting
Held regularly (typically weekly) to review progress. Attendees include the Project Manager and Product Manager (or customer representative). Stakeholders may join as needed. Topics include:
- Overall status: scope, budget, timeline
- Risk assessment and mitigation updates
- Third-party dependencies
- Decisions on scope changes or blockers
3) Project Status Report
A concise document or dashboard that supports the status meeting. It should summarize progress, risks, and decisions.
4) Steering Committee Meeting
Less frequent than status meetings, but more strategic. Invite senior stakeholders and the Product Manager to:
- Review project health
- Advise on escalated issues
- Approve major changes
5) End-User Test Meeting
Held before UAT or during iterations. Purpose:
- Explain testing scope and expectations
- Clarify user responsibilities
- Ensure readiness and engagement
6) Product Handover Meeting
Conducted before Go-Live. Invite the maintenance/support team to:
- Review the product in detail
- Share documentation and operational procedures
7) Project Closure Meeting
Held at or just after Go-Live. Covers:
- Summary of deliverables and outcomes
- Lessons learned
- Final stakeholder alignment
8) Team Meetings
Frequent touchpoints with the development or engineering team. Use these to:
- Track progress
- Share risks and decisions
- Offer support and unblock tasks
9) Phase-End Communication
Notify stakeholders when a phase concludes. In Waterfall, this may be a formal email. In Agile, it resembles a Sprint Retrospective or Closure meeting.
10) Meeting Minutes
Use email to summarize decisions and discussions. A well-designed email template improves clarity and consistency. Avoid attaching separate documents unless necessary.
Why the Critical Path Still Matters?
Even in Agile environments, where iterative delivery and flexibility are prized, the critical path remains essential. It represents the sequence of tasks that directly impact the project’s timeline — if any slip, the whole delivery slips.
A Project Manager must:
- Identify dependencies and bottlenecks.
- Track progress on time-sensitive tasks.
- Communicate risks tied to delays in the critical path.
Cause and Effect in Project Execution
Project environments are rich with causal relationships. Every decision or event has downstream effects. Recognizing and communicating these cause-effect chains is a core responsibility of the Project Manager.
Here are practical examples:
- Initial Requirements (Cause) → You build a project plan (Effect).
- New Requirement Midway (Cause) → You re-plan, raise a risk, or issue a scope change SOW (Effect).
- Unexpected Delay or Blocker (Cause) → You assess and communicate the risk and its impact (Effect).
- Committed End Date (Cause) → You calculate the latest possible start date based on the critical path (Effect).
If the customer insists on a later start but keeps the same end date (Cause), you begin the project with a known risk (Effect), which should be documented and discussed during the kick-off.
Why This Matters?
Project execution is not just about tracking tasks—it’s about understanding interdependencies, anticipating consequences, and communicating impacts. A Project Manager must be able to:
- Identify the root cause of changes or risks.
- Predict their effects on scope, timeline, and resources.
- Communicate clearly and proactively to all stakeholders.
This mindset transforms reactive management into proactive leadership.
Wrap-up
Role Synergy and Accountability in Lean Project Teams
In an ideal setup, each role—Product Manager, Project Manager, Product Owner, and Scrum Master—is filled by a dedicated expert. A strong Product Manager can leverage the strategic planning of a Project Manager and the customer-centric focus of a Product Owner. Likewise, a skilled Project Manager benefits immensely from the facilitation and team support offered by a Scrum Master.
But let’s face reality: budget constraints often mean one person must wear multiple hats.
When Roles Collapse, Activities Must Not
Even if roles are merged, key activities must still be executed. These activities are especially critical in two domains:
- People interactions and collaboration: stakeholder alignment, team engagement, customer feedback loops.
- Planning and delivery discipline: scope control, timeline management, risk mitigation, and budget adherence.
What matters most is not how many people you have, but that each activity has a clear owner—someone accountable and responsible for its execution.
The Blame Game
Let’s be honest: if something goes wrong, someone will trace it back to the project team. And more often than not, the finger will point to the Project Manager.
That’s why clarity of roles—even in lean teams—isn’t just a best practice. It’s a shield against ambiguity, missed expectations, and postmortem finger-pointing.
"It is better to have a bad method than to have none". Charles de Gaulle
0 Comments